[sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
- From: Jack Jones <telescoper@xxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:06:07 -0700
I thought it was pre-approved in the budget, or does this go over budget?
Something to check on.
Jack
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Chris Hanrahan <chris.hanrahan@xxxxxxx>wrote:
> Per the Constitution and Bylaws (latest and greatest version soon to be
> posted to the website - thanks Rick and Peter), the ordering of
> port-a-johns
> would have to go to a vote of the general assembly anyway as the cost will
> exceed $200. I'll add it to the list of goodies for the March 11 meeting.
> I will assist AJ with his "vote yes on Proposition Port-a-john" campaign.
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jack Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:18 PM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
>
> Hey Board!
> I may have to after all, Rich. Bad news, the guy wants to raise the $250
> rate from the AASP to $300 for the AAMM for the weekend, even tho we are
> the
> less moneyed. He says he barely broke even for the AASP and gas went up.
> It's the same price for 2 as for 3 portapotties, so I made no 'head'way
> there. <gotcha> This development is for the Board to mull over. I don't
> know
> where else to 'go', anyone else have another source? Take a vote or give me
> a go-no go from the Board, let me know. As far as weather permitting, I can
> cancel up to the Thursday before, in case of inclemency.
>
> Jack
>
>
Other related posts:
