[sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
- From: <saguaroastro@xxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 8:27:09 -0500
That be me Jack, Webmail didn’t;t put my signature in.
Rick (Telrad)
---- Jack Jones <telescoper@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> who dat?
> Just need one more Board member to weigh in and it's done....
> >
> >
> > ---- "Prause wrote:
> > > Now that we have moved and are voting, I vote yes, that we spend the
> > > $300 for the 3 portajohns. Mitch
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hanrahan
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 7:00 PM
> > > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> > >
> > > Mitch, are you moving we move on this or are you suggesting the actual
> > > movement? I think you're suggesting the actual movement; therefore, I
> > > second the movement that we spend the $300 for port-a-johns.
> > > Many movements regarding future movements.
> > >
> > > Does anyone see why we could not vote on this via e-mail? I do not find
> > > any such information in the Constitution and Bylaws.
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of Prause, Mitchell F. (Spec Cas Risk Svcs UW Suppo)
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:58 AM
> > > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> > >
> > > OK, I'm game, I'll move that we spend the $300 so that we can vote on
> > > it. Mitch
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Polakis
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:12 AM
> > > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> > >
> > > ---- Rick Rotramel wrote:
> > > > I seem to recall a change made recently to the SAC constitution about
> > > > the Board being able to expend an unexpected expense with a majority
> > > > vote of the Board.
> > > >
> > > > I think the limit was less than $1000.00 for an expenditure without
> > > > the vote of the entire club. Or was it $500.00?
> >
>
>
>
Other related posts:
