[sac-board] Re: Board meeting, 08-16

From: Tom Polakis <tpolakis@xxxxxxx>
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:51:46 -0400
The vote to join EVAC in paying a fee to the BLM passed at a SAC board by 
majority vote, with one Board member voting nay.

I need to dig up the Dilbert cartoon whose last frame has him saying, "there's 
such a think as being too proactive."

Tom


---- Jennifer Polakis <m24@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Regarding the $150, we can just have Dwight write a check to EVAC and I can 
> get it to Claude Haynes.  I didn't realize that any of that BLM stuff 
> happened--and am a little miffed about it.  Hey! Lets see if we should be 
> paying to use Picket Post--I bet we could even give some money 
> retroactively--and all those years on Vekol--I think we should just go ahead 
> and pay for those too. Ughhh.
> 
> So...no board meeting for August.
> 
> Jenn.
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Michael Collins
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 8:30 AM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: Board meeting, 08-16
> 
> On 08/15/13 01:11, Jennifer Polakis wrote:
> 
> > Yikes, I forgot about this--We'll be driving the speaker out to the 
> > meeting
> > from our house.  If we can postpone this until Sept. meeting or at the 
> > very
> > least move it up to 7:00, I'd appreciate it.  I don't have an agenda yet,
> > but would like to bring up getting an astronaut or someone extra great for
> > 2014 like Alex Filipanko or Wendy Freeman--I need time to figure the cost 
> > of
> > a larger venue at GCU and cost and logistics on hiring such a speaker.
> > Let me know about hopefully postponing this meeting until Sept 20th.
> 
>   I have no objection to delaying the board meeting until September. The
> only item I had for the agenda concerns payment for the BOM permit
> covering the Hovatter Road sites. EVAC has covered payment for the next
> three years, so we need to approve reimbursement of $150 to EVAC to
> cover our half. I've not reviewed to the constitution to determine if
> that requires approval from the board, a vote of the membership or
> neither. In any case, I don't see this as a serious issue.
> 
> -- Mike --
> -- 
> cal_donley@xxxxxxx 
> 
>
[sac-board] Re: Board meeting, 08-16

Other related posts:
