[sac-board] Re: Board meeting, 08-16

  • From: "Richard Harshaw" <rharshaw2@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:42:21 -0700

Mike, as I recall (and remember, this is coming from an aging star geezer)
that the constitution allows expenditures of up to $200 without approval by
the board or m embership.

Anyone else on this list know for sure?



Richard Harshaw
The Arizona Star Splitter


-----Original Message-----
From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Michael Collins
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 8:31 AM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: Board meeting, 08-16

On 08/15/13 01:11, Jennifer Polakis wrote:

> Yikes, I forgot about this--We'll be driving the speaker out to the 
> meeting from our house.  If we can postpone this until Sept. meeting 
> or at the very least move it up to 7:00, I'd appreciate it.  I don't 
> have an agenda yet, but would like to bring up getting an astronaut or 
> someone extra great for
> 2014 like Alex Filipanko or Wendy Freeman--I need time to figure the 
> cost of a larger venue at GCU and cost and logistics on hiring such a
speaker.
> Let me know about hopefully postponing this meeting until Sept 20th.

  I have no objection to delaying the board meeting until September. The
only item I had for the agenda concerns payment for the BOM permit covering
the Hovatter Road sites. EVAC has covered payment for the next three years,
so we need to approve reimbursement of $150 to EVAC to cover our half. I've
not reviewed to the constitution to determine if that requires approval from
the board, a vote of the membership or neither. In any case, I don't see
this as a serious issue.

                                -- Mike --
--
cal_donley@xxxxxxx

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. sac-board
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2013