[rollei_list] Re: Rollei Retro 100/Agfa 100 - problems
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:11:05 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thor Legvold" <tlegvold@xxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:56 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rollei Retro 100/Agfa 100 -
problems
Edge markings are very weak, if visible at all. I had to
squint to see that it was Rollei Retro in the first
place.
Meaning incorrect (too little) development?
Thor
It probably means just that. You would have to prove it
by developing a roll yourself so you know how it was done.
Kodak, Ilford, Agfa, controlled the exposure of the edge
markings quite carefully so they are a reliable measure of
development. I don't know about Bergger or even who makes
the stuff now. A properly developed roll would tell if the
edge markings come up dark gray or black as they should.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
