[rollei_list] Re: Rollei 35S, SE

  • From: marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:39:48 GMT

Fred I can live with the difference of opinion quite happily. I would like to 
quote a source since you have, and that is to say C. Bresson achived great 
results with a primitive RF something I don't think even he could have done 
with a Rollei 35.
Marvin.
Sent via BlackBerry® from 3

-----Original Message-----
From: Frédéric Fichter <ffichter@xxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:33:15 
To:rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 35S, SE


I was reading Stephen Shore's "American Surfaces" yesterday evening, and can 
only disagree.
To each its own...

Fred


 
On Monday, October 01, 2007, at 03:20PM, <marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I agree with you 100 per cent Carlos when the main purpose of traveling is not 
>to take photographs the 35 is indeed a good camera if the reason for traveling 
>is to take photographs it is not to be recommended. 
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

F‰ez"â²Óè²Ûh®‰ez)b²×ëyéb²Û(®®nÇ+‰·š¶º%•è¥ŠËkz«ž²×ëyéb²Û(®
"¶.nÇ+‰·¢žØ^²æãyË_‰é]9ò–ˆ 
Šx"žÚ0Ãëyéb²Û(®'²æìr¸›y«k¢Y^ŠX¬¶·ª¹ë-~·ž–+-²ŠàÂ+aº{.nÇ+‰·¢žØ^²æãyË_‰é]9ò–ˆ 
Šx"žÚ0Ãëyéb²Û(®§–)Þ±æ«r›•æ«r¯zÆ«y«ÚŠV›•æ­†Ûiÿü0ÁúÞzX¬¶Ê+ƒö«r¯zÏë¢Y^ŠX¬

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2007