[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital

If done correctly. Otherwise, it can be too dark and flat. Good work demands effort. I am partial to film and the darkroom, too. I heard part of report on public radio yesterday where the filmmaker used film and was expected to by his backers even though it cost more. It may be that a good compromise is shooting with film, scanning, editing in photoshop and then having a negative made to size and then contact printing. Excellent images demand lots of work. 
Doug


On Jul 19, 2007, at 8:37 PM, iusar4s@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic to a state of the art rock synthesizer.  One is cheaper, faster, and more convenient; the other is high art. 

Peter Nebergall

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: