[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:35:48 +0100
They are very much different but, IMHO, not as different as, for
example oils versus acrylic paint, and certainly either of these
compared to watercolour.
At the end of whatever process one has chosen, film - develop -
enlarge - develop print. Digital to print, digital to print via some
sort of manipulation software or a scanned film hybrid to digital
print a photographic print is the result.
Some people refer to prints from digital as "plastic" I assume they
refer to the lack of grain (???) in fact for me it has taken
"photographic realism" to a higher plane.
I processed my own film all my photographic life. I have had a
darkroom in my house most of the last 45 years. I still take
photographs on film for fun - but for me the whole enlarge and
develop process - which is a technical skill I felt I was still
improving even after so long - particularly "mastering" the tiny
dynamic range and extreme contrast of Cibachrome - was hard work and
very time consuming.
(Incidentally anybody thinking digital has a restricted dynamic range
should try enlarging a Kodachrome slide onto Ciba).
I now print entirely from the computer and if I am interrupted it is
no longer an inconvenience/catastrophe.
If your main objective is to consistently produce good prints my
experience tells me digital is the best way.
The downside is cost. My Canon EOS 1Ds mk2 was very much more
expensive than my Rolleiflex so you need to have been a real film
eater for digital to be a choice based on economy rather than results.
Frank
On 23 Jul, 2007, at 02:57, ERoustom wrote:
My first two days in my darkroom have me gleefully puzzled. There
is so much to learn, and it will be a while before I'm comfortably
making the all those connections from behind the lens to in front
of the fix bath. It makes scanning negatives seem easy and fast.
Peter's simile is so apt. Gaining skill, intellectual, physical and
technical, and truly learning to be patient is what film
photography (that goes the full cycle from click to print) is all
about. It's a medium, and a discipline.
My thinking about how I use my camera(s) what films I choose,
has changed completely since the darkroom (and my underdeveloped
film) humbled me this weekend. Maybe film and digital shouldn't be
compared. It's clear to me now that they do different things, and
demand different approaches.
Elias
On Jul 21, 2007, at 3:06 PM, J Patric Dahlén wrote:
Peter Nebergall wrote:
Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic
to a state
> of the art rock synthesizer. One is cheaper, faster, and more
convenient;
> the other is high art.
Very well said, Peter!
I own a digital compact camera, but I don't like to use it to take
photos of my loved ones... Instead I use it for fast documentation
and when I need photos of something to show on the internet/send
with email...
There are more feelings involved when I use my cameras for film,
and work in the darkroom. Then I feel creative. I can always
digitalize film/prints when I want or need to. Digital has it's
place, of course, even for me.
/Patric
_________________________________________________________________
Trött på att pendla? - Sök jobb där du bor! http://
jobb.msn.monster.se/
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: J Patric Dahlén
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: ERoustom
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
Elias On Jul 21, 2007, at 3:06 PM, J Patric Dahlén wrote:
Peter Nebergall wrote:Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic to a state> of the art rock synthesizer. One is cheaper, faster, and more convenient;> the other is high art. Very well said, Peter!I own a digital compact camera, but I don't like to use it to take photos of my loved ones... Instead I use it for fast documentation and when I need photos of something to show on the internet/send with email...There are more feelings involved when I use my cameras for film, and work in the darkroom. Then I feel creative. I can always digitalize film/prints when I want or need to. Digital has it's place, of course, even for me./Patric _________________________________________________________________Trött på att pendla? - Sök jobb där du bor! http:// jobb.msn.monster.se/--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: J Patric Dahlén
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: ERoustom