[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Michael Eric Berube <pj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:00:32 -0400
While I'm an unrepentant Capitalist, I find that defining the 'worth' of
'art' merely by the price tag is a sad effort.
Sad too is the defining of art by the medium. \
I know a few very talented watercolourists who still insist that
photography itself cannot be valuable art compared to a watercolour
painting for the same reasons that Carlos claims that photos made via
digital process cannot be considered valuable to the art market compared
to photographs made using film and chemistry. I'm inclined to agree that
I'd be willing to pay more for a painting than most photographs simply
because of the work that goes into a painting, but I'd pay no more for a
Cibachrome made from Rolleiflex slide than I would an 'Giclee' print
made from a D200.
The value of art, is how it makes you feel. Period. I find some very
worthy art here:
http://640x480.net/archive/
Many of these images are art because when I see them, they reach out to
me deeply on an emotional level.
They are not art because they pull down a big price tag at all the best
galleries (though, they might if they were printed really
small...)...that is all marketing, and often has nothing to do with art
itself.
Kind of on this topic...Dewitt Jones wrote an (another) excellent
article in this latest edition of Outdoor Photographer about the value
of pointing and shooting:
http://www.outdoorphotographer.com/content/2007/aug/basic_jones.shtml
While I've always been an advocate of professional photographers knowing
their craft, I must agree with Jones that, composition and decisive
moment are THE crucial factors in a good photograph.
Everything else is stuff that the technicians (or camera) can work out,
but without composition and decisive moment in your repertoire, you'll
turn out perfectly exposed crap.
"There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept." -Ansel
Adams (1902 - 1984)
If you judge the quality of an image with a loupe in hand or by looking
at the price tag, you've missed the point of photography as I see it.
Then again, I'm just a wedding photographer...what do I know about art?
:)
Be well,
Michael Eric Berube
GoodPhotos.com
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Frank Dernie
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Frank Dernie