[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: "Gene Johnson" <genej2ster@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:11:26 -0700
In terms of "winning out". That news is already in :) But oddly,
strangely, I find I can continue shooting film, and playing in my
darkroom, and making photographs the old-skool-way just like I always
did. As Cartman says: "I'll do what I want!"
On 7/20/07, Peter K. <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, there is room for both. To me its more like vinyl LPs v. CDs.
There is always room for both, but one will eventually win out and it
won't be film.
Peter K
On 7/19/07, iusar4s@xxxxxxxx <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic to a state
> of the art rock synthesizer. One is cheaper, faster, and more convenient;
> the other is high art.
>
> Peter Nebergall
--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--
Be Just and Fear Not
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
