[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital

Here is another thought on digi vs film. With digi more people produce good 
images but less people produce great images.
I think that this is a trend that has stretched back to the time of painting. 
When one had to be very skilled to produce a great image.Along comes the 
sillouete image, the physionatrace sorry can't recall the spelling and 
democratises the whole image process, more people can do it but the overall 
quality goes down.
I think the same is true today, more people now have the means to produce 
decent images, but it generally ends there.
Marvin.
Sent via BlackBerry® from 3

-----Original Message-----
From: "iusar4s@xxxxxxxx" <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:37:40 
To:rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital


Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic to a state of 
the art rock synthesizer.  One is cheaper, faster, and more convenient; the 
other is high art. 
Peter Nebergall

Other related posts: