[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Douglas Nygren <dnygr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:59:10 -0400
Yes. Superior in what sense? The answer will depend on what one considers superior.
Doug
On Jul 21, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Frank Dernie wrote:
Wrong. Different yes, better demonstrably not. That some prefer either is a matter of taste not superiority of one or the other.
Frank
On 20 Jul, 2007, at 23:20, Eric Goldstein wrote:
film and vinyl are and will continue to be...
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Eric Goldstein
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: iusar4s@xxxxxxxx
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Gene Johnson
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Frank Dernie
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- » [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
Frank
On 20 Jul, 2007, at 23:20, Eric Goldstein wrote:
film and vinyl are and will continue to be...
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: iusar4s@xxxxxxxx
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Peter K.
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Gene Johnson
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Eric Goldstein
- [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: Frank Dernie