[rollei_list] Re: 2.8FX shutter cock and film advance 'synchronisation'
- From: <chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:56:07 +0000
No question its only a few years old. Does everyone else agree with Richard
on the 'synchronisation' question I posed?
Mike
On 12/11/05, Marc James Small <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> At 03:01 PM 12/11/05 -0800, Richard Knoppow wrote:
>
> > Jerry, it it is an old camera. Of course there are still
> >Rolleis being made but any of the automat variations will be
> >pretty old. Do you know for certain what lubricants Rollei
> >was using on these cameras. Note that even modern synthetics
> >do not have an infinite life, for one thing thay can
> >accumulate dirt. In any case, fixing the problem requires
> >opening up the camera.
>
> Richard
>
> This thread is not about the Automat. It is about the Rolleiflex 2.8FX --
> check out the Subj: line! The FX replaced the GX about a half-decade
> back
> and is in current production. This is a new camera, just as Jerry has
> been
> saying.
>
> Marc
>
> msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
>
> NEW FAX NUMBER: +540-343-8505
>
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
Other related posts:
