[rollei_list] Re: 2.8FX shutter cock and film advance 'synchronisation'
- From: <chatanooga@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:12:17 +0000
Thanks guys for the continued interest... just to clarify in my case, yes I
too need to return the crank (the 'backward' motion) fully to get a shutter
press however the prior forward/ clockwise motion does not need to have been
completed (i'm repeating myself so I better stop!)
On 12/14/05, Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> --- Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> escribió:
> > The backward motion does nothing. It is a
> > convenience to be able to have the crank back a the
> > neutral postion where it can be folded down if
> > desired....
>
> Richard, with due respect,I disagree with you on this
> point completely, the backward motion allows to
> release the shutter; if you don't do this backward
> motion till the stop you can't release the shutter,
> except if your film transport mechanism is wrong.
>
> All the best
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam
> Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo
> http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
Other related posts:
