[pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:38:03 -0800
Janet,
I'm at a loss to know why you stopped using D-76 and went to HC-110.
What was the reasoning behind this? D-76 is one of the all time best
developers available. HC-110 is sort of a generic blah developer.
There are many many great developers out there, D-76 being one of
them, and in my view, HC-110 is not one of them.
IMHO of course,
Jim
At 08:06 AM 2/19/2007 -0500, Janet wrote:
Thank you, Jonathan. I've printed this out to look again more
closely. I cut the negatives this morning and they don't look as
great as I thought they might last night. My 35mm negs used to look
good when I used d76. 120 didn't always and I've fought with that,
but this is a new problem. I'm almost out of this hc110. Next time
it's back to d76. If they look the same as these I'll really be
going after it! Thanks again.
Janet
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Janet Cull
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: mail1
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Janet Cull
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
Thank you, Jonathan. I've printed this out to look again more closely. I cut the negatives this morning and they don't look as great as I thought they might last night. My 35mm negs used to look good when I used d76. 120 didn't always and I've fought with that, but this is a new problem. I'm almost out of this hc110. Next time it's back to d76. If they look the same as these I'll really be going after it! Thanks again. Janet
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Janet Cull
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: mail1
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Janet Cull