[pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: "EJ Neilsen" <ej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:34:06 -0600
I have the all to common problem of hearing it in my head, but failing to
have it actually hit the paper in full sentences or as intended.
Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
Skype ejprinter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BOB KISS
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:00 AM
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
>
> DEAR JONATHAN,
> I resemble that remark! I often sit down at the computer at very
> early hours. Later when I am more awake I sometimes wonder what I was (or
> if I was) thinking.
> CHEERS!
> BOB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of mail1
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 11:52 AM
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
>
> Bob, Thanks, so right you are. I noticed another typo, also I should
> have mentioned the exposure time for the proof sheet should be the
> minimum to achieve maximum black at the film edge.
> I suffer the fog of working on my correspondence late in the evening.
> Jonathan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BOB KISS
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 7:27 AM
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
>
> DEAR JONATHAN,
> You would increase the exposure by halving, not doubling, the
> ASA or
> ISO.
> CHEERS!
> BOB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of mail1
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:13 AM
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
>
> Janet try comparing the clear edge of your negatives you are in
> question about with some of your other negatives of the same film. If
> you notice an increased in density it may be either chemical or age
> related fog.
> If your shadow detail is none existent or weak your film may be under
> exposed more likely than under developed. Film with reduced development
> usually will require more exposure. Try to make this determination with
> film that has recorded a day light scene with a soft shadow. If your
> proof sheets are exposed long enough at grade 2 or 3 then developed to
> produce a black film edge you can gather an understanding of film
> exposure, and film development.
> If the shadows are with out a hint of detail you might consider
> increasing exposure by doubling the ASA. If your high lights wash out
> and lack gradation you might consider reducing film development by 20%
> or 10% if using T-Max style films. If your high lights are gray you may
> be under developing your film. I suggest you use fresh film, paper, and
> developers to eliminate errors caused by age. This might take a few
> tries to get it dialed in. The proof sheet exposure will remain nearer a
> constant once you get your film exposure and development under control.
> The reason I suggested grade 2 or 3 exposure is to prevent the problems
> that my crop up with lower grade exposures being unable to print black.
> This can lead to another discussion sometime.
>
> Jonathan Ayers
> Mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sauerwald Mark
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 6:52 PM
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
>
> Janet
>
> I use HC-110 and am a big fan. I mix it as I am about
> to use it, and use it one shot.
>
> For some films I use dil B (1:31), but when the
> development times get too short, I switch to dil H
> (1:63) and the times become more comfortable.
>
> I measure the syrup with a syringe that I get from a
> local feed store, they are cheap and make the
> measuring of syrup quick, neat and easy.
>
>
> --- Janet Cull <jcull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I should have said, I used HC110, dilution b, that
> > was mixed the end
> > of Sept. Yikes. That's old, yes? Maybe I just
> > answered my own
> > question. I've not been wild about this developer
> > because of the
> > short dev. times, so maybe it's just time to dump
> > and go back to d76.
> >
> >
> > On Feb 18, 2007, at 5:47 PM, Janet Cull wrote:
> >
> > > Can anyone describe what film looks like when it's
> > under
> > > developed? Thanks.
> > >
> > > Janet
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ======================================================================
> >
> > > =======================================
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, go to
> > www.freelists.org and logon to
> > > your account (the same e-mail address and password
> > you set-up when
> > > you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
> > >
> >
> >
> ========================================================================
> =====================================
> > To unsubscribe from this list, go to
> > www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the
> > same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> TV dinner still cooling?
> Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/
> ========================================================================
> =====================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/691 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2007 5:06 PM
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/691 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2007 5:06 PM
>
>
> ========================================================================
> ====
> =================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
> ========================================================================
> =====================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/691 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2007 5:06 PM
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/691 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2007 5:06 PM
>
>
> ==========================================================================
> ==
> =================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
> ==========================================================================
> ===================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
