[pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Janet Cull <jcull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:37:54 -0500
There is shadow detail and the edge markings are very dark gray.
Maybe almost black. The edge/base is the same sort of light gray as
parts in the image. The negatives just look sort of blah, though
they print ok. Maybe it's slightly fogged?
On Feb 18, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Janet Cull" <jcull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 2:47 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] under-developed?
Can anyone describe what film looks like when it's under
developed? Thanks.
Janet
Low contrast and low density. The best clue is probably the edge
markings. These should be dark gray or black.
Negatives which have been properly exposed but underdeveloped
are often printable by using high contrast paper. The disavantage
is that the increased contrast will also exagerate any blemishes or
dirt on the negatives and any uneveness of illumination in the
enlarger.
It is possible to increase negative contrast by intensification
but there are hazards to it and most methods increase grain.
Probably the safest method is Selenium toning but this produces
only a modest amount of intensification. Reportedly Kodak Brown
Toner will also work as an intensifier. Neither of these will
damage the image. Intensifying may be result in more satisfactory
prints than high contrast paper.
Note that if there is _no_ shadow detail at all neither the use
of high contrast paper or an intensifer will supply it. This is
more often the case for underexposure than underdevelopment.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
======================================================================
=======================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Richard Knoppow
- References:
- [pure-silver] under-developed?
- From: Janet Cull
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Richard Knoppow
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- » [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Janet Cull" <jcull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 2:47 PM Subject: [pure-silver] under-developed?
Can anyone describe what film looks like when it's under developed? Thanks.Janet
Low contrast and low density. The best clue is probably the edge markings. These should be dark gray or black. Negatives which have been properly exposed but underdeveloped are often printable by using high contrast paper. The disavantage is that the increased contrast will also exagerate any blemishes or dirt on the negatives and any uneveness of illumination in the enlarger. It is possible to increase negative contrast by intensification but there are hazards to it and most methods increase grain. Probably the safest method is Selenium toning but this produces only a modest amount of intensification. Reportedly Kodak Brown Toner will also work as an intensifier. Neither of these will damage the image. Intensifying may be result in more satisfactory prints than high contrast paper. Note that if there is _no_ shadow detail at all neither the use of high contrast paper or an intensifer will supply it. This is more often the case for underexposure than underdevelopment.
--- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx====================================================================== ======================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] under-developed?
- From: Janet Cull
- [pure-silver] Re: under-developed?
- From: Richard Knoppow