[pure-silver] Re: RC to FB
- From: DarkroomMagic <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: PureSilverNew <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 01:33:01 +0100
It sound good, but I'm worried about trapped humidity.
Regards
Ralph W. Lambrecht
On 12/31/04 10:43 PM, "Peter De Smidt" <pdesmidt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ryuji Suzuki wrote: For those who give proper (which I mean very close to
> thepossible best) processing to prints, the expected action of archival
> toning is to protect image forming grains from deterioration due to
> environmental pollutants.
> Would encapsulating the mat board and print be a good way to protect from
> environmental pollutants? I once read that if you want to put a print in a
> bathroom or kitchen, that you should frame the dry-mounted print with glass
> as the backing board, instead of using archival corrugated board. You then
> band the edge of the glass, mat board, print, mat board, glass sandwich with
> aluminum foil, which is then taped (with Mylar tape) to form a vapor
> barrier.The extra glass would add weight and cost, and one would have to be
> careful that the tape doesn't peek out from under the frame. Does this
> soundlike a viable way to minimize print deterioration due to environmental
> factors?
>
> -Peter De Smidt
>
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
