On 10/28/2010 10:24 AM, Howard Efner wrote: > TTL metering will compensate for the difference in transmission since it > measures light after the optics. > > Establishing an "effective film speed" will also compensate for lens > transmission, shutter speed errors, f/ stop calibration errors, light > meter errors, and GOKW. > > Thank God for that old, obsolete, technically inferior, film! > > Howard > In rereading this article, something else jumped out at me. In traditional film photography, there is some light falloff at the edges of the circle of coverage. This is particularly pronounced in the shorter focal lengths. IIRC, this is due to both the innate characteristics of the lens design, and the angle at which light is traveling relative to the plane of the film ... which is most pronounced at the edge of the circle of coverage. However, if the circle of coverage is considerably larger than the negative, the effect is negligible. For example, I have a Schneider SA-XL 72mm. The lens will cover 5x7, but, since I use it on a 4x5 camera, I don't see significant light falloff. With digital sensors, though, the angle makes a really big difference because - as the article mentions - the sensors are typically light sensitive "tubes" - if you hit them at too oblique an angle, the photons don't "fall down the tube", so to speak, and you effectively get light falloff. Since I shoot nothing serious with digital, I've never much paid attention to this artifact ... I've been too busy being frustrated with the lack of dynamic range :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tim Daneliuk tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.