[pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- From: allandan <allandan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:55:34 -0700
I have always found Tmax 400 to be a difficult film to process (not so
with Tmax100). I think the Delta films are superior in grain and
processing ease at the 400 speed, and pretty much the same at 100 speed.
Allan
İbrahim Pamuk wrote:
Hi,
I have used HP3 and FP4 once upon a time and swiched to Tri-X and
Plus-X. Then somewhat used Tmax100 & 400. I always preferred to use
Kodak HIE. I was wondering comparison between Tmax and Delta films.
Any reccommendation about these? I believe it is hard to prefer after
one being use Tri-X and then switch to HP5 for example. Nevertheless
it will worth to hear the experience in comparison with Tri-X vs HP5
and Tmax vs Delta?
Regards
Ibrahim Pamuk
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- From: Jason McPeak
- References:
- [pure-silver] Kodak vs Ilford
- From: İbrahim Pamuk
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- » [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
Hi,I have used HP3 and FP4 once upon a time and swiched to Tri-X and Plus-X. Then somewhat used Tmax100 & 400. I always preferred to use Kodak HIE. I was wondering comparison between Tmax and Delta films. Any reccommendation about these? I believe it is hard to prefer after one being use Tri-X and then switch to HP5 for example. Nevertheless it will worth to hear the experience in comparison with Tri-X vs HP5 and Tmax vs Delta?
Regards
Ibrahim Pamuk
- [pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- From: Jason McPeak
- [pure-silver] Kodak vs Ilford
- From: İbrahim Pamuk