On 11/19/2013 01:40 AM, Michael A. Smith and Paula Chamlee wrote: > The first definition of "image"—a representation of the external form of > a person or thing in art. > > That also is very true and would apply to many photographs as well, but > that definition implies that all the work of art is--in this case a > photograph-- is only a representation of what has been photographed. I > certainly cannot speak for anyone else, but when my wife, Paula Chamlee > and I make photographs we always want the photograph "to be more than > what it is of" (to quote Paula). We want it to allude to life rhythms. > Example: Edward Weston's pepper #30 is not only "a representation of the > external form of a thing," It is that, surely, but it is so much more > than that, No one in their right mind, I hope, would refer to that > photograph as an "image." To do so, implies a lessening of the > resonances that may be found in a work of art. > > Michael > I guess what "image" means is different to different people. Eugene Atget considered himself an "imagier" (a maker of images). He seen to have thought himself a maker of these images as record-shots for the use of artists (painters). But in my opinion, his images were much more than records of what happened in front of his camera. I do not really know if he knew how great a photographer he was, and if he was just unusually modest. But if Atget was just an imagier, I would be proud to be as good a one as he. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 07:25:01 up 15 days, 9:46, 2 users, load average: 4.23, 4.59, 4.50 ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.