Just quick answer to this one point of e-mail. I think renaming library libproc-3.2.8 to libproc-ng-3.3.0 is better than to libproc-3.3.0 in all ways. Version change breaks itself all depending programs so adding ng isn't IMHO problem... I don't know other programs using libproc (we had once reporter in Fedora Bugzilla that requires libproc headers packaged but I think this is very rare). Since I am not working in Red Hat anymore I haven't got much time for this but I can review merged code next week.Thanks. I read that as a; the patch set is not hopeless and may result to a merge after rigor testing and careful consideration what to do with lib release number.It doesn't look hopeless to me. I'll be interested in Craig's or Jan's impression.
Jan
