[procps] Re: procps changes

  • From: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@xxxxxx>
  • To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:33:26 +0200

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:48, Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2011, at 5:38 AM, Sami Kerola wrote:
>
>> I like to see what and why failed, meaning I'm not in favor
>> redirecting potentially useful information to null.
>
> But you hide messages for autoconf, autoheader, libtool and automake?
>
> Personally, I prefer consistency.

Hi Jim et.al.

It's consistent now.

https://gitorious.org/~kerolasa/procps/sami-procps-ng/commit/e2ce3044f628e7246e66107fcac52b59ec11d395

None of errors are thrown away, and I changed shell style to match how
I like to see it. Better?

-- 
   Sami Kerola
   http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/

Other related posts: