[PA28235] Re: ethanol in mogas

  • From: Strnat <strnat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pa28235@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:27:01 -0400

Blended fuel legislation threatens GA



AOPA is lobbying to amend a bill that could threaten all of piston-engine general aviation.

The "10 by 10 Act" (H.R.4357 and S.3553) would require all motor vehicle gasoline sold in the United States be blended with 10-percent renewable fuel by the year 2010.

"The intent of the legislation is certainly well-meaning, but the legislative staff who wrote it were apparently unaware that almost all renewable fuels are incompatible with current piston-powered GA aircraft," said AOPA President Phil Boyer.

So AOPA is working to educate Congress before the bill progresses any further in the legislative process.

AOPA is asking lawmakers to exempt aviation gasoline (avgas) from the requirement. And AOPA wants another provision so that alcohol-free premium-grade automobile gasoline remains available for use in aircraft flying with an autogas STC.

Ethanol — an alcohol distilled from corn — is the most common renewable fuel. But tests by the FAA and Cessna have shown that ethanol blends can't be used safely in today's piston aircraft.

Ethanol-based fuels attract water into an aircraft's fuel system, which can lead to engine failure, Boyer explained to bill sponsors Rep. Gil Gutknecht (R-Minn.) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa).

Ethanol also is incompatible with aircraft fuel systems, including electric fuel pumps, and makes some types of fuel gauges inaccurate.

Because ethanol has less energy per volume than gasoline, an aircraft engine has to consume more of a blended fuel to obtain the same power, and that reduces range.

"AOPA urges you to exempt avgas from the requirements of the '10 by 10 Act,'" Boyer wrote to Grassley and Gutknecht. "States that have enacted laws mandating an ethanol component in gasoline have exempted avgas.

"We request the federal government do the same.


-Reinhold

N8560W


On Jul 18, 2006, at 12:29 AM, PilotKris@xxxxxxx wrote:

The key phrase is "as long as you're not unsafe".
 
Only truly unenlightened airport managers would specifically ban any specific activity.
 
As I said before, public airport managers can have rules that ALL must comply (including FBOs) that include safety, training, environmental issues, storage, etc., that can effectively shut down MoGas dispensing on the field. Private airports can do whatever they like. 
 
Most people I've observed refueling with MoGas have been in violation of one or more EPA, AQMD (Air Quality Management District), DOT, or state or local fire safety regulations (not to mention complete lacking of common sense).
 
One can't just load the trunk of the Buick full of non-approved gas containers purchased at Walmart, fill them up at the local HyVee, drive to the airport, then out on the ramp, pull out the gas and start pouring it in an airplane...
 
For example:
The transportation of the fuel falls under the juristrition of the DOT.
The storage of the fuel falls under the juristrition of the EPA and Fire Marshal.
 
We aren't talking about 5 gallons of gas to fill your jetski, we are talking about over 500 pounds of fuel to fill a 235 (432lbs for a 236). 
 
That has safety issues that extend far beyond just yourself and your plane. That nifty refueling rig you and your buddies constructed out of parts bought on ebay springs a leak (or worse a leak and a spark) and you've not only a safety issue capable of causing hundreds of thousands of dollars (maybe millions at an airport), you've also got an HazMat spill that could cost big bucks to decontaminate (not to mention the potential for bodily injury or death).
 
There are rules and laws that need to be followed specifically to assure the safety of the public any your safety too ('cause way to many people seam to lack any sort of common sense).
 
One parting thought, has anyone checked their aviation liability insurance policy to see if it covers losses resulting from transporting, storing and dispensing of your own fuel?
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/17/2006 12:32:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, jjhoneck@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Here is some more info about pumping mogas at your airport:

This from an attorney:

"The right to fuel your own airplane with fuel you brought in from
elsewhere may also be covered by 'common law'. After all, it is  your
property and your airplane. So long as you are not unsafe, it is your
right. Such a law would be akin to a company requiring you to fuel up
your car at the company pumps or you couldn't live in the company
housing or work at the company. Or being required to buy a Chevy if you
worked at Cheverolet. Such laws are not legal."

Also:

One of the instructors who teaches for the AOPA CFI renewal
seminars is named Bill Gunn, his full time job is for the
State of Texas and he speaks about this issue at the
seminars.  When he gets complaints about such issues, he
tells the local city councils and airports boards that they
must follow the contract and federal laws.

Here is a link with each states' agency.
http://www.nasea.org/state1.htm 

Pilot: Bill Gunn - Austin, TX
Aircraft: N252MD, RV-4, Red
Home Airport: Georgetown (GTU)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"





From:    PilotKris@xxxxxxx
To:    pa28235@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:    [PA28235] Re: ethanol in mogas
Date:    Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:02:59 +0000
Content-Type: Multipart/alternative;
boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18485_1153164448_1"



 
Wow Jay, You're just a wealth of missinformation.
 
Check with your Lawyer.
 
Those rules pertain to the granting of Exclusive Rights at airports. They don't grant any special rights to pump your own gas.
 
They can have rules that ALL must comply (including FBOs) that include safety, training, environmental issues, storage, etc., that can effectively shut down any MoGas dispensing on the field.
 
The airport is completely within it's rights to say that fuel can only be dispensed by an appropriately licesened FBO. But you do have the right to open your own FBO (if another exists on the field).
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/15/2006 4:26:59 AM Pacific Standard Time, jjhoneck@xxxxxxxxx writes:
It took some digging, but here it is:
 
***********************************************************

http://www.faa.gov/arp/aal/Sponsor%20Guide/append4e.doc

        f. It will not exercise or grant any right or
privilege which operates to prevent any person, firm, or
corporation operating aircraft on the airport from
performing any services on its own aircraft with its own
employees [including, but not limited to maintenance,
repair, and fueling] that it may choose to perform. 
       ... 
    23. Exclusive Rights.  It will permit no exclusive right
for the use of the airport by any person providing, or
intending to provide, aeronautical services to the public.
For purposes of this paragraph, the providing of the
services at an airport by a single fixed-based operator
shall not be construed as an exclusive right if both of the
following apply:

  a.. It would be unreasonably costly, burdensome, or
impractical for more than one fixed-based operator to
provide such services, and
  b.. If allowing more than one fixed-based operator to
provide such services would require the reduction of space
leased pursuant to an existing agreement between such single
fixed-based operator and such airport.
    It further agrees that it will not, either directly or
indirectly, grant or permit any person, firm, or
corporation, the exclusive right at the airport to conduct
any aeronautical activities, including, but not limited to
charter flights, pilot training, aircraft rental and
sightseeing, aerial photography, crop dusting, aerial
advertising and surveying, air carrier operations, aircraft
sales and services, sale of aviation petroleum products
whether or not conducted in conjunction with other
aeronautical activity, repair and maintenance of airc raft,
sale of aircraft parts, and any other activities which
because of their direct relationship to the operation of
aircraft can be regarded as an aeronautical activity, and
that it will terminate any exclusive right to conduct an
aeronautical activity now existing at such an airport before
the grant of any assistance under Title 49, United States
Code.

***********************************************************

 

Bottom line: If your airport accepted federal funding, EVER, they can't deny you the right to fuel your own aircraft.

 

Now they CAN come up with insurance "requirements" (similar to Lycoming's "no mogas" 'rule'), but those are easily worked around simply by making sure that your fueling set up meets state regulations, the way our "Mighty Grape" fuel truck does.

 

Our state-compliant fuel truck cost a TOTAL of $2800 (including the professionally-made fuel tank and pump), and has saved us in excess of $7000.   AND we get to use it as a pickup truck, so it's a win-win all around.

--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA

Pathfinder N56993

www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


-------------- Original message from PilotKris@xxxxxxx: --------------

What Law is that exactly?
 
 
In a message dated 7/14/2006 3:15:23 PM Pacific Standard Time, jjhoneck@xxxxxxxxx writes:
(Just back from a couple of days camping with the plane (and my son) up on Madeline Island, out in Lake Superior.  If there is anyting else that better illstrates the best use of a GA airplane, I don't know what it is -- 2.2 hours from Iowa City to Lake Superior!)
 
(BTW: 90+ degrees, climb to 10,500 feet, cruise for over 2 hours on that horrible car gas.  Dang, if it didn't run perfectly fine?  Amazing!  :-)
 
Anyway, your airport CAN NOT prevent you from bringing car gas to fuel your own plane.  They are violating the law by doing so, and you might point that out to your airport manager -- with a nice letter from your attorney?
--
Jay

Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

-------------- Original message from FlyboyEd@xxxxxxx: --------------

In a message dated 7/13/2006 10:05:29 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, mikegot2go@xxxxxxx writes:
Bringing gas to the airport sees like too much work 
and my airport does not allow it.
 
Ed
 
 
 

JPEG image

Other related posts: