It's still an issue -- DB2 for z/OS remains a radically different animal than DB2 LUW (Linux, Unix, and Windows). On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Bill Ferguson <wbfergus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does anybody on here work with both Oracle and DB2? > > I was wondering, merely for my own information (thankfully nobody has > ever suggested this), if what Tom Kyte wrote many years ago is still > applicable today > (http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:6495007510621886::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1886476148373)? > > Specifically where he says: > "What DB2 do you use on all platforms? Answer -- none, they have > different DB2's for different > architectures. (that report often seems to confuse things in DB2/OS390 > with DB2/UDB -- "features > they've had for years", that OS390 -- UDB, totally different code > base, totally different > architecture." > > Has IBM improved this 'initial' flaw, or is this still an issue with DB2? > > > -- > -- Bill Ferguson > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- Adam Musch ahmusch@xxxxxxxxx -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l