Naturally. But if a movie is released to an MVPD, I would think that this is giving one access to the movie. Now that one has access, would it not be "fair use" to record the movie on a DVR to view later? Or am I missing your point? I guess I don't understand the difference between my VHS machine connected to an antenna and a DVR connected to a MVPD. Isn't it the same philosophy? I know that I am allowed, and that a broadcaster cannot prevent, me from recording a program on my VCR when tuned into their channel. However, would this apply to a program on a cable system? But perhaps I am missing the point of the MPAA. Are they saying that for VOD and PPV, the fair use philosophy does not apply? I am all for those that own media to be able to protect their media and prevent others from using it for gain. That certainly would not be fair for someone else to make money off the owner's work, or even to view the work without the owner's required compensation. But if the owner prevents me from viewing something that was paid for, especially if I paid directly for it, it is certainly unfair to prevent me from being able to view it. I guess then the question becomes whether I can view it on my schedule or must I be forced to view it on their's. I would argue that there is no harm in viewing it on my schedule. However, the MPAA might, not because my view would bring harm, but because others might use it for their unlawful gain. That is the unfortunate reality of this fallen world. But if, in the process, it prevents me from viewing the rightfully paid-for programming, then I am being taken. Of course, using the media for making a point, such as quoting a book, is another issue altogether. But then, if I have paid for the program, like buying the book at the store, do I not have the right to quote the book? Do I not have the right to transfer a section of the movie to some other medium and display it to the public, to make a point? Does it matter how I receive the program (MPVD, OTA, DVD, etc.)? Dan Mark Schubin <tvmark@earthlink .net> To Sent by: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx opendtv-bounce@fr cc eelists.org Subject [opendtv] Re: MPAA wants to stop 06/26/2008 08:56 DVRs from recording some movies AM Please respond to opendtv@freelists .org Fair use allows you to quote from my book. It does not allow you to bust into my home and go into my library to access the book. Access and use are different. TTFN, Mark dan.grimes@xxxxxxxx wrote: I guess I'm getting my history and laws mixed up. I was under the impression that there is an element of "fair use" when it comes to media, no matter which delivery platform (OTA, MVPD, physical) the media is received. I realize there is no specific law that provides this "fair use" but there are plenty of court cases that have upheld this philosophy. Perhaps it is very complicated since there is no particular law out there that defines fair use. Certainly, there are laws as to what it means to hold copyright and if that is being infringed upon. Many court cases have attempted to provide the line between copyright and fair use. So, one question is, does the ability to time-shift a movie (i.e. record on a DVR) that is received through an MVPD violate copyright? I would argue not, but certainly the MVPD wants to control the ability for the populous to record, thus protect, it's material. The other question is, can the owner of media prevent you from recording the media; in other words, does this violate fair use?\ Dan Inactive hide details for "Adam Goldberg" <adam_g@xxxxxxxxx>"Adam Goldberg" <adam_g@xxxxxxxxx> "Adam Goldberg" <adam_g@yah oo.com> Sent by: To opendtv-bou nce@freelis <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ts.org cc 06/26/2008 06:43 AM Subject [opendtv] Re: MPAA wants to Please respond to stop DVRs from recording opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx some movies ... Whether there’s a right or not gets down to lots of things, but among them is Fair Use, which is an element of the first amendment. Someone with more philosophy than me can determine whether that’s a civil right or whatever.