[opendtv] Re: Adobe in Push to Spread Web Video to TV Sets

At 2:48 PM -0400 4/21/09, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:

Craig Birkmaier wrote:


In one sentence, this is what "the point being made" really is:

Quoting: "But [the denizens of Hollywood and Silicon Valley]
increasingly agree on one thing: a standard for online video called
Adobe Flash."



Yes, Bert I did use the article to make a point...
That's what I do with this list. And equally important Bert, I can depend on you to miss the point and set me up for a bit of education for others on the list. YOU are the one who introduced QuickTime into the discussion... 

Thank You!
The article I posted was mostly PR hype. Flash is an important technology for the web, but it IS NOT an open standard, NOR is it likely to become one for video compression. Even YouTube is moving to h.264.
The most important point of the article is that Internet video is moving into the family room, something I have discussed on this list since I started it. The sad reality is that the media conglomerates have done everything in their power to slow down the inevitable transition to web based digital media and hardware-based approaches to TVs and STBs that are extensible via software upgrades.
One such tactic is to support NON-standards to create marketplace confusion, as Microsoft did with HD-DVD to slow the adoption of Blu-Ray, a standard created by the media conglomerates and Hollywood. 


 > And all of this comes back to the CHOICE of major media companies

 to use proprietary technologies to CONTROL the end-user experience.


Yes, I enjoy the new bells and whistles on a few occasions. However,
here's the most typical scenario for me. I sit down late in the evening
for maybe a 1 to 1 1/2 hour relaxation time with some recorded TV
program(s). If I were to rely on Internet TV, it would not be unusual to
get stuck with a significant portion of that time spent downloading and
installing, and heaven forbid debugging, some new software or other.


Get a Mac.



There is no free lunch. The flexibility comes at a price.
And there is no price to pay for the dead-end hardware based solutions that Hollywood and the CE industry keep trying to push on us?
You keep pushing MPEG-2, a legacy technology that SHOULD be phased out by the end of this decade. Locking consumers into hardwired dead end products - filled with their IP - is the major tactic that has been used to maintain their power... 

Interlace
MPEG-2
59.94

And dare I mention copy protection and related content management techniques?

You tend to toss the baby out with the bath water...
Not all computer based solutions are as poorly implemented as those that have come out of Redmond. That is one of the reasons I keep talking about solutions that actually work. Solutions that are creating huge markets for digital media content delivered via the Internet. 


Back to the article (even if you didn't read it). The article was
trumpetting the inclusion of Adobe Flash in TELEVISION STBs and
integrated sets. But hey. Those who surf the web know that Flash has
been one of many players in this arena. And that if anything, the number
of players seems to be growing. *OF COURSE* Flash would be among those
to be used for Internet to TV sets. What's new?
Perhaps YOU should read the article again Bert. It announced the INTENT of Adobe to move Flash to the big screen in the family room. This is FAR form a done deal.
For someone who has been active on this list for MORE THAN A DECADE, you should understand that the vast majority of attempts to take on the media conglomerates have met with failure.
Microsoft has spent a small fortune trying to partner with the big media companies to own a piece of this. Those million, and millions were accepted eagerly by companies who knew that Microsoft could create enough FUD to seriously slow down the transition to the REAL digital media infrastructure for the next 50 years. 

Now you can go back to debugging your PC...

Regards
Craig






----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. 



----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org 
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: