[opendtv] Re: 625 video quality is good enough....

  • From: "Dale Kelly" <res0xtey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:57:06 -0700

I'm now wondering if the lower resolution I experienced might have 
originated at the DSHD network operations center, possibly during 
conversion/encoding. It was constant and seemingly more significant and than 
would have occurred from the lens issues you describe. However, I have no 
technical knowledge of the Discovery Channel's operations.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Roberts" <roberts.mugswell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:19 AM
Subject: [opendtv] Re: 625 video quality is good enough....


> The 2003 performance was also shot in HDTV, 1080/50i, but using Thomson
> LDK600 cameras. The mix of lenses was not as good as for 2004. 2003 used 
> an
> Alfacam truck, 2004 used a newly HDTV-converted  BBC truck. There were
> several shots in the 2003 show that I wasn't happy with, some down to 
> camera
> noise, but most down to the lenses. One particularly had chromatic
> aberration that we couldn't get rid of. Since the truck and kit came as 
> part
> of a single deal, there was little we could do except shuffle things to 
> get
> it as good as possible.
>
> Again, I was at the shoot, monitoring with the Vision Supervisor.
>
> Things can only get better.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dale Kelly" <res0xtey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 5:11 AM
> Subject: [opendtv] Re: 625 video quality is good enough....
>
>
>> Thanks Alan,
>> I should have mentioned that my reference was for the 2003 performance. I
>> eagerly await your 2004 HDTV broadcast. In my opinion this event is a
>> cultural treasure and one of the finest broadcast productions each year.
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Alan Roberts" <roberts.mugswell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 3:07 PM
>> Subject: [opendtv] Re: 625 video quality is good enough....
>>
>>
>> > Possibly a wrong assumption. If you were watching the 2004 "Last Night
> of
>> > the Proms", I can confirm that it was shot exclusively in HDTV, using
> Sony
>> > HDC950s and recorded on HDD5. I was involved with setting this up and
> was
>> > in
>> > the OB truck for the event, standing behind the Vision Supervisor. It
> was
>> > shot in 1080/50i, using a mixture of lenses, some genuine HD, some good
>> > SD,
>> > one dubious SD. Generally, lenses were placed where their performances
>> > could
>> > be used to best effect, but with some necessary exceptions. I suspect
> you
>> > were seeing softness from the least good lenses.
>> >
>> > I didn't see the broadcast programme, for obvious reasons.
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>> > From: "Dale Kelly" <res0xtey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 7:43 PM
>> > Subject: [opendtv] 625 video quality is good enough....
>> >
>> >
>> >> You might recall a recent posting suggesting that HDTV might be of
> little
>> > value in countries using the 625 line system since that system's 
>> > quality
>> > was
>> > likely good enough. My position was, that as good as that image might 
>> > be
>> > relative to other analog based standards, it could not compete in
> quality
>> > with true HDTV video displayed on a 720 or 1080 large screen display.
>> >> I'm revisiting this subject only because I saw a very graphic
>> >> illustration
>> > supporting my argument last evening when viewing the BBC production of
>> > "Last
>> > Night at the Proms", on the Discovery HD channel. This is an excellent
>> > program in every way but it was produced in the 625 (580? DTV) 16X9
>> > format*
>> > and compared to other HDTV programming on the same network was
> noticeably
>> > softer, particularly on the medium and long shots which are such an
>> > integral
>> > part of that program. Clearly the viewers in Britain would have noticed
>> > and
>> > wanted the difference.
>> >>
>> >> * my assumption.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>> >>
>> >> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>> > FreeLists.org
>> >>
>> >> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>> > unsubscribe in the subject line.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>> >
>> > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>> > FreeLists.org
>> >
>> > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>> > unsubscribe in the subject line.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>>
>> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
>>
>> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
> FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
> 


 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: