If you've been reading this thread, you should already know that we're talking of the practical possibilities of getting 1080/50p and 60p to the viewer. At present, MPEG2 cannot reduce the raw data rate down to a practical value for transmission within the existing agreed spectrum allocations. I would have thought that was obvious. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Harvey" <tjharvey@xxxxxxx> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:54 AM Subject: [opendtv] Re: 625 video quality is good enough.... > At 10:17 PM 10/18/2004 +0100, Alan Roberts wrote: > >Indeed, MPEG2 would struggle, but a truly anonymous transmission system > >could carry MPEG4, WM(whatever version) etc, and by thoroughly future proof. > >What we need to standardise on is the transport stream, not the scanning > >format. Let's try to get it right this time. > > > > > > > > > > I agree, 50/60P should be the ultimate format when technology can > > > accommodate. However, I don't know that it can be done in a transport > > > constrained to MPEG2. > > What do you mean an MPEG2 transport cannot progressive scan??? The MPEG-2 > transport can carry any data one could wish to convey. > > Also, the choice between interlace and progressive scan is a no-brainer. > Interlace was novel when it was introduced in 1933, but it has no place in > a modern broadcast system. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.