[nanomsg] Re: Simplifying CMake build

  • From: Bruce Mitchener <bruce.mitchener@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:03:43 +0700

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Why was CMake put aside ?
> I always found CMake way more usable than autoconf/automake and the piles
> of crap that come with it.
>

I agree myself ... especially on Mac OS X where you want to deal with
things like universal binaries and an xcode project is useful.

 - Bruce

Other related posts: