[nanomsg] Re: Simplifying CMake build

  • From: Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:48:54 +0200

Why was CMake put aside ?
I always found CMake way more usable than autoconf/automake and the piles
of crap that come with it.


On 23 August 2013 10:41, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As the main building system for nanomsg is autotools, the role of CMake is
> basically reduced to generating MSVC solution files.
>
> To do that, the CMake files can be significantly similified, i.e. features
> checks are not needed, there's no need to account for non-Windows platforms
> etc.
>
> I've created such simplified cmake build in simple-cmake branch in the
> github repo.
>
> If there are no objections I would like to merge it into the mainline.
>
> Thoughts?
> Martin
>
>

Other related posts: