Why was CMake put aside ? I always found CMake way more usable than autoconf/automake and the piles of crap that come with it. On 23 August 2013 10:41, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > As the main building system for nanomsg is autotools, the role of CMake is > basically reduced to generating MSVC solution files. > > To do that, the CMake files can be significantly similified, i.e. features > checks are not needed, there's no need to account for non-Windows platforms > etc. > > I've created such simplified cmake build in simple-cmake branch in the > github repo. > > If there are no objections I would like to merge it into the mainline. > > Thoughts? > Martin > >