[nanomsg] Re: The nanocat utility

  • From: Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:53:01 +0200

I really like the idea of such tool to help debugging although I think the
simplest way of actually doing it is using on the bindings available and
do it in higher level languages.
One of the advantages of using ruby/python/... is that you easily
manipulate the data.


On 23 August 2013 08:15, Bruce Mitchener <bruce.mitchener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> On 22/08/13 19:06, Paul Colomiets wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  2. Can I use getopt.h?
>>>
>>> I guess there isn't such a library on Windows, and getopt_long is not
>>> portable according to linux man pages.
>>>
>>
>> As long as the project is in separate repo, no problem. In nanomsg
>> project LGPL would conflict with MIT license.
>>
>
> The musl libc (and others) have non-LGPL licensed versions of things like
> getopt_long.
>
>  - Bruce
>
>

Other related posts: