--- Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Omar Kusturica wrote: > > "Also, to say that ethical difference between acts > cannot be established > on the basis of who is committing them does not mean > that there cannot > be other pertinent ethical distinctions." > > Torture and murder are legal terms. *They may be legal terms, but they are also ethical terms. However, you > deny the significance > of the rule of law in making ethical distinctions.* > Having denied the > rule of law, you also deny the grounds for making > ethical distinctions. *Doesn't follow, Phil. The distinction betweem ethical and legal judgements has been known since Socrates' time at least. (Probably earlier but I hope you get my point.) I am not an expert but I suspect that J.C. also distinguished between the laws of the land (Empire) and ethical laws. Anyway I admit that the international law has some significance, not absolute of course, but that probably makes me more of a legalist than the Bush administration. > You have made judgments based on acting. According > to you, Al-Zarqawi > is morally superior to Eric because Al-Zarqawi > acted. *Within the posited moral jungle world, yes. But US soldiers > are also acting, just against the side you > sympathize with. *I don't want to go into what soldiers do now. They sometimes follow orders and sometimes not, sometimes they follow them out of moral conviction and sometimes not. This would require a lengthy discussion which I don't have the inclination for right now. The only > grounds for distinguishing these acts is your > sympathies. So, drop the > talk of morality and just acknowledge that you > prefer the actions of Al > Zarqawi because you sympathize with his beliefs. > And instead of > whinging about the morality of invading Iraq, just > admit that you are > cheering for the insurgency. As I said, have the > courage of your > convictions and admit you are opposed to the US > adventure in Iraq > because you are sympathetic to Al Zarqawi's ilk. *The reverse might be closer to it. > *I think this bit nicely summarizes Omar's position > regarding the > significance of the rule of law. > > (Callicles in Plato's _Gorgias_) *Callicles' position seems a bit like Nietzsche's. It is a position worth consideration but not quite my own. I'll admit that I keep going back to Nietzsche, though. O.K. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html