[ian-reeds-games] Re: Tactical Battle 1.12 dev 1
- From: Ian Reed <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ian-reeds-games@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:57:26 -0700
Hey Allan,
Thanks for the positive feedback. I'm really glad you like the
feature. I wasn't sure exactly what to do on the wording but decided it
wasn't as important as getting the basic chance flag out.
You're totally right about the different sounds. I meant to get some
feedback on that and forgot.
It breaks down into 2 things, 1 is the type of sound and the other is
numbering them so you can get a random one.
For instance a successful attack could have 3 different sounds and one
is randomly played each time.
And a failed attack could have it's own 3 sounds of a sword slicing
through empty air or being blocked.
Here's what Craig had suggested about sound types:
Craig said: Regarding random sounds, I remember it was suggested before.
But regarding having sounds for hits, misses and critical and such,
maybe the sound naming scheme should be something more like:
* unit_skill_success
* unit_skill_fail
* unit_skill_critical
I say: I think since we are already using warrior_attack.wav or just
attack.wav this should be the successful version since that's how it
currently works.
So then if you wanted a failing sound it would be warrior_attackfail.wav
or attack_fail.wav as Craig suggested.
And the randomized sounds based on number suffixes would be separate
though maybe I can do that soon as well.
Not sure how the critical will work exactly, but we're not there yet anyway.
Well, now that I've written it I think that will work out pretty well.
Does anyone like or dislike the attack_fail.wav and
warrior_attack_fail.wav sound naming?
Ian Reed
Other related posts:
