[openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:42:44 +0100 CET
> On 3/22/07, Jonas Sundström <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Adding a third architecture does not alter the stability of the x86
> > -
> > or PowerPC-dependent parts, but it can help improve the machine-
> > independent parts, and shake out machine-dependencies in the
> > supposedly machine-independent parts.
>
> Might i suggest x86-64 as a viable port? I was hoping it'd be easier
> then another completely difference architecture... 8-).
Probably. Except it *is* a completely different architecture anyway.
I have yet to see an x86-64 device that fits in the pocket though :)))
François.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Ari Haviv
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Mathew Schofield
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Ari Haviv
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Mathew Schofield