[openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: "Mathew Schofield" <mr.skoe@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:19:29 +1100
On 3/22/07, Jonas Sundström <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Adding a third architecture does not alter the stability of the x86-
or PowerPC-dependent parts, but it can help improve the machine-
independent parts, and shake out machine-dependencies in the
supposedly machine-independent parts.
Might i suggest x86-64 as a viable port? I was hoping it'd be easier
then another completely difference architecture... 8-).
--
Thank You,
Mathew Schofield
"Show me someone perfect, and i'll show you an idiot."
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: François Revol
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Paulo Estrela
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Jonas Sundström
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
Adding a third architecture does not alter the stability of the x86- or PowerPC-dependent parts, but it can help improve the machine- independent parts, and shake out machine-dependencies in the supposedly machine-independent parts.
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: François Revol
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Paulo Estrela
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Jonas Sundström