[openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: "Jonas Sundström" <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:00:23 +0100 CET
Simon Taylor <simontaylor1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Though I'd be quite interested in a geeky sort of way to see
> Haiku running on iPods, palmtops, headless MIPS platforms,
> etc, etc I don't think those ports should live in the Haiku tree,
> or be included in the GSoC. By all means fork the code and
> do it as a separate project.
Maintaining a fork of Haiku might turn out to be a lot of work.
I would probably borrow bits and pieces instead.
> We are all agreed the focus is the desktop - for me that means
> targets are x86 and possibly PPC. Anything else distracts from
> Haiku's core focus and should be a separate project.
It would certainly distract me, but I don't see how it would distract
a whole lot from Haiku's core focus. I seem to be the only one
interested in this. ´:)
/Jonas Sundström.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Andrew McCall
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Simon Taylor
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- » [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Andrew McCall
- [openbeos] Re: ideas for SoC
- From: Simon Taylor