> As you can see from the > responses, not only Brecht finds this mode useful. :-) Anyone who thinks > this mode is silly, please just ignore it. > > Best regards, > -Stephan I'm a bit with Koki here. One of the biggest selling points of Haiku is that "it's not Linux" - there's a consistent approach to the whole OS. The biggest threat to this actually happening is one of the biggest problems with all open-source projects: feature-creep happens all too easily. Someone does some work, they find it useful, others find it useful too, so it is added to the main tree. It only adds one more option to one preference panel, so no one can claim it really adds complexity, right? In order to prevent this getting out-of-hand, there needs to be a bit more to the criteria to adding a new feature (especially a new "mode" that changes something fundamental about how the OS responds to events) than just "someone finding it useful". That leads down the road signposted Linux and I think most of us don't want to go there. In this particular example, maybe we need to think about some of the problems actually discussed. Some people have mentioned they'd use this mode in rare cases where there are overlapping windows that they want to copy things into. Surely for rare cases they don't want to have to fire up the mouse settings window to change the global system-wide option? Wouldn't a better approach be able to "pin" windows in the z-order, perhaps through opt-click on the tab to pin to front and opt-right click to pin to back? This could also be an option in deskbar's menu for the windows. Alternatively a "pin" icon in the tab near the zoom button. One could then have a preference for whether new windows should be pinned by default, and the whole thing would feel a lot less like some different modes hacked into the existing framework (no offense intended to those who did the work). Simon