On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:28, Jon Yoder <darkwyrm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:28, Alexandre Deckner <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think it has worked pretty well for previous releases. >> >> I suggest we do the same and first vote the features we want in for R1 >> (numbered propositions + wiki voting + discussion if necessary). When >> this is set in stone, we can then dispatch the workload over time and >> people (alphas). Betas would then be only focused on testing / QA, >> developing tools and formal testing guidelines if possible so that a >> maximum of users can help in this phase. >> >> The most important task to begin is to define the R1 feature set, after >> that it's "just" a matter of scheduling and organization. >> >> Note there was already a document started in this regard, that we should >> update / merge with the new one (or the other way around) >> https://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/FutureHaikuFeatures > > I agree. From what I can tell, the FutureHaikuFeatures duplicates only some > of the information, so merging only the relevant parts seems sensible. Done. I updated http://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/FutureHaikuFeatures to be a voting page for R1's features. (http://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/R1/PlansOfConquest was also updated to mention that page and to indicate it's function.) For reference, the page before this edits was https://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/FutureHaikuFeatures?version=28 The permissions for casting a vote have not yet been granted to non-admins. I'm guessing a few days of review is in order, before the actual voting occurs. So, feel free to edit it or to suggest additions. --mmadia