Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/11/25 Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Over at HaikuPorts we are using the 0.11 workflow but I don't > > > really > >> see the "accepted" being used any differently than just being the > >> "owner". I'd rather just have the nobody default so that devs can > >> look through the "nobody" or open tickets and take ownership of > > > the > >> ones they think they can fix. At haikuports we have a blank owner > >> option. > >> Perhaps change "nobody" to "open" or "blank" or just leave as is. > > I also prefer the current notion of "accepted" where you can > > actually > > be sure the developer is actively working on it, while you can > > pretty > > much fix any other ticket no matter which owner it has. > So you are in favor of the new workflow scheme? No, this is how it is right now. The only difference (AFAIU) is that only the developer himself can accept tickets right now, while with the new workflow, other people can let the developer accept a ticket without any action on his part. If I understand that correctly, wouldn't like that, as it actually blurs the message of the otherwise clear "accepted" status. Bye, Axel.