[geocentrism] Re: stupid question about the moon!
- From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:13:55 -0400
> [Gary writes:]
..........
>
> I maintain that this solar eclipse shadow movement is every bit
> as big an obstacle to geocentrism as the geostationary/static
> satellites have been viewed as being by Dr. Jones.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gary Shelton
>
Gary,
My analysis of 3 body alignments in HC and GC at
http://users.rcn.com/robert.bennett/GeocentrismRJBv2.doc
included the solar eclipses but I didn't put the diagrams up, except for HC,
because there is no disagreement between the 2 views within the 5% error I
estimate for both. The nominal umbral speed averages about 1060 mph, under
optimum alignment conditions.
If the GC view didn't really predict the correct shadow speed, don't you
think the Bad Asts would be crowing without end?
To ease your doubts, Gary (Thomas?), I have added the GC analysis for the
solar eclipse on PPs 39 and 49 of the link above.
(Be not unbelieving, Thomas, but believing!)
The real issue is the HC/GC conflicts in the other P.49 table alignments,
which no one has resolved as yet.
Resurrexit, sicut Ipse dixit!
Robert, your brother in Christ
Other related posts:
