[geocentrism] Re: stupid question about the moon!
- From: "Gary Shelton" <garylshelton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:54:49 -0500
"The math that would explain this is non-existent as of yet, at least that's my
experience."
This only make the point you don?t understand it does not proves nor does it
disprove anything, except we don?t know everything. However, the faster
relative speed of the sun in relationship to the moon is what is OBSERVED not
theorized, as in A centric mechanics.
Allen
[Gary writes:]
No, you're right about not understanding it. I don't. My point was that no
one else has exhibited their knowledge of the shadow phenomenon from a
geocentric viewpoint yet either. Yes, of course the faster relative speed of
the sun versus the moon is what is seen, but this in no way explains the shadow
phenomenon. It is inadequate to do so, at least given the accepted distances
from the earth to the sun and the earth to the moon. The sun only gains 1/2
degree per hour on the moon. Without the moon being much closer to the sun (to
gain a huge "sweeping" speed of the shadow) I don't see how it can be made to
explain the shadow's 1000 mph eastwardly motion upon the earth. But again,
you're right. It doesn't make it impossible just because Gary Shelton can't
explain it.
I'm adamant only that no one else has explained it either.
Gary
Other related posts:
