[geocentrism] Re: stupid question about the moon!
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
"The math that would explain this is non-existent as of yet, at least that's my
experience."
This only make the point you don?t understand it does not proves nor does it
disprove anything, except we don?t know everything. However, the faster
relative speed of the sun in relationship to the moon is what is OBSERVED not
theorized, as in A centric mechanics.
Allen
Gary Shelton <garylshelton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[Allen wrote:]
Because the sun is moving faster than the moon you lose sight of the sun
as it catches up with the moon and then overtakes the moon. The moon is losing
ground so to speak to the sun. That is why the shadow moves W-E.
[Gary writes:]
Allen,
I don't believe we can say that it is a difference in tangential velocities
between the sun and moon causing the shadow movement. The math that would
explain this is non-existent as of yet, at least that's my experience. If it
were that easy, Dr. Jones would never have had to remove his paper in the first
place.
And it's not a case of relative motions either. The explanation the acentrists
use for the phenomenon is the tangential speed of the moon in front of a STILL
sun. This particular reason is tough for us as we do not have this set of
events within the geocentric view. Both of our objects (the sun and moon) are
moving. In their view only one is, and that makes a huge difference. Am I
making sense? It's not relative motions.
I'm looking forward to Dr. Jones' paper. It is necessary to somehow explain the
shadow movement from our side perfectly and completely. At this moment, we are
far from that, I fear.
Gary
GaryLShelton@xxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
