Philip M It pleases me that my humble efforts have provided you with those hours of food for dialogue. Firstly -- and I think you know this -- I do not accuse you of any lapse of honesty nor do I doubt your dedication. I simply don't agree with your conclusions. Many things are said in the excitement of the moment of some discovery or other which, in the light of further discoveries and sober reassessment, need to be restated or revised. van Allen has never been repudiated so far as I know but means of living with or compensating for the problems which he highlighted are found. That is normal. It is still known that lingering in the belt will be fatal but that a rapid passage will be safe. As to leaving via the polar route -- safer of course, but much more expensive. If it could be avoided, so much the better -- and it was. No -- I have no potato patch but I do have some interesting purple potatoes I've kept alive by harvesting some seed each year from the compost heap. If I wasn't so lazy, I'd have been out around the local industrial estates harvesting old pallets to make a potato patch to grow them in big enough to make a decent meal or three. But to your warning -- you're much too late. My father died in 1977 still entreating me to " ... mark my words -- it'll come again!" He was referring to the Great Depression of course, a period during which he had had much time to be grateful for the opportunity to labour long days for the reward of food and being allowed to sleep in a barn covered with wheat sacks in lieu of blankets. My point is that if you predict doom for long enough, you'll be rewarded with something you can pass of as another Great Depression. You may even be witness to something worse. That doesn't show prognosticative powers however. Anyway, I think I'll just keep buying mine from the supermarket -- at least the less exotic varieties anyway. Paul D ________________________________ From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, 11 October, 2008 10:39:53 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Bible Geocentrism - The Earth is NOT Moving!! Well Paul, your post has given me hours of food for dialogue, but I will deal here only with this small portion. "You neglect to mention that the claim that man cannot pass through the van Allen belts and live has its origin solely in conspiracy theorists misconstruing references to the radiation. That is a nasty presumption of my honesty and science being suspect . This had its origin in all the texts that I read, and as confirmed by my colleagues at the Island Lagoon satellite tracking station when I worked under contract for NASA. It is unfortunate I did not see any reason to retain those documents.. Just as I did not retain those that indicated the existence of the Ozone hole and the reasons it existed. You can rest assured that we were dedicated space enthusiasts, and had no reason to falsify data that would jeapodise mans conquest of space. It is easy to find authoritative references which directly address the issue, concluding that the amount of time spent in the zone will indeed increase exposure but that it barely increases one's lifetime dose. It is NOT at all easy to find those references of which I talk in any more modern sources.. One can be excused for wondering why? In most of the ancient scientific texts one will allways find reference to the mistakes made as science is improved. Why not in this instance. Other than an unsupported assertion that Van Allen was wrong.. We may have hoped he was wrong, but we were not stupid enough to falsify the evidence. Let me reassert.. The mapping of the fields of radiation and magnetism etc in space by many satellites going many hundreds of miles out in long elliptical orbits was an ongoing continuous monitoring effort. These were emmensely important to confirm the earlier high altitude rockets earlier readings which were limited in scope for large volume measuring. The instruments were calibrated and recalibrated with enormous expense. Each component vacuum tube or solid state was subjected to an inspection and testing proceedure everytime it changed hands and was placed into another area. I saw the invoiced price of a 15 shilling 6AQ5 bought into our lab jump to 5 pounds after just 5 such inspections.. If we wanted one for personal use we stole it. Continued reference to this non starter simply reduces your credibility." I believe Von Braun, and Asimov who trusted this data from these satellites as to the radiation strength, and the height to which it extended enough that they themselves doubted man could pass through them , and it was Asimov himself who proposed it was not a hindrance because we would still escape by a polar route where this radiation was minimal or non existent. I can clearly remember his diagrams with respect to this idea. That gave us emense hope. Wiki The trapped radiation was first mapped out by Sputnik 3, Explorer 4, Pioneer 3and Luna 1. Not entirely true..It could hardly be called mapping..check the links. I began in 1962. The satellites we traccked and collected data from were specially designated. and worked perfectly...This is not to say that those more well known units did not contribute. In fact they confirmed the data from the exploration rockets. I am not saying they have falsified readings, but if you read this article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt and all the relevant links, you will find that a lot is left UNSAID. about the effect on human beings. A lot unsaid about earlier predictions.. If there was a cover up, it seem likely from the modern data in wiki, that Van Allen was well positioned to co-operate. This sounds really OUT THERE The belts are a hazard for artificial satellites and moderately dangerous for human beings, difficult and expensive to shield against. There is a proposal by the late Robert L. Forward called HiVolt which may be a way to drain at least the inner belt to 1% of its natural level within a year. The proposal involves deploying highly electrically charged tethers in orbit. The idea is that the electrons would be deflected by the large electrostatic fields and intersect the atmosphere and harmlessly dissipate. [7] Well maybe it was a success back in the Appollo days.. Will explain why we can't get through now, because the belts regenerated didn't they.. Now that IS presumptive of me.. but I'm still impartial on the matter.. No matter now, the first part of the BIG Bang has just hit... Man will not be worried about the moon or mars from now on.... got your potatoe patch planted? Plenty of rain in a tank or bottles full in the cupboard.. You debunked us as nuts when we told you of this crash 2 years ago.. Philip. ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Deema To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:20 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Bible Geocentrism - The Earth is NOT Moving!! Philip M Sorry -- been busy. Herewith a few thoughts. From philip madsen Tue Oct 7 23:06:56 2008 These do not confirm a man was present any more than does the unmanned Martian probes ... You are correct. However, if I adopt the same level of suspicion and distrust, I can claim that the Martian probes are actually manned but NASA has maloevelant intentions in keeping this secret because the truth is that they can't manage to build functional autonamous robots and carefully contrive the photo angles to avoid showing foot prints. Proove me wrong. However I am still impartial as regards the truth of the matter.. Nevertheless I still have suspicions, as I do trust the integrity of the original findings of early 60's satellites that indicated the hazard of the Van Allen belts.. I'm surprised that you keep making reference to this Philip. You neglect to mention that the claim that man cannot pass through the van Allen belts and live has its origin solely in conspiracy theorists misconstruing references to the radiation. It is easy to find authoritative references which directly address the issue, concluding that the amount of time spent in the zone will indeed increase exposure but that it barely increases one's lifetime dose. Continued reference to this non starter simply reduces your credibility. From philip madsen Tue Oct 7 22:52:52 2008 after all this time I thought you would have gotten a bit familiar with geocentrism. Here I guess it's my turn to apologise for putting you to all that effort because of course I have not forgotten your previous explanations involving the aether. I visualise your explanation as saying that, as the Universe rotates, all the laws of physics rotate with it -- an unproven and unprovable proposition. It is entirely an artifact generated to prop up the hypothesis that the universe rotates once daily. My problems with this explanation remain the same. Your assertions/explanations are a bit like a favourite of mine -- "I say there is an invisible elf living at the bottom of my garden. Prove me wrong." And again -- "The universe was created 6000 years ago with history incorporated to give the perfect impression of great age." I say it was created one second ago, complete down to your fictitious memory of having originated these messages to which I am replying. Well, I'm not of course -- that too is part of the perfect history. Time really begins when you start reading this message. Prove me wrong. This approach is entirely unproductive and is the reason that you can't get an argument with bona fide scientific investigators for whom only one thing matters -- repeatable consistent results from real experiments which fit into the total scheme like the pieces of a random order jigsaw puzzle having no picture to guide you. There is only one way for all the pieces to fit together. Paul D ________________________________ Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail. Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail