I think the discussion we've been having has been most productive. I also
can't think of another place where such discussion would be approrpiate.
Bruce
-- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Gary Wunder wrote:
Folks, I'd like to respectfully suggest that when new features are presented here we ought to limit our comments about them simply to whether we like them or how better to implement them. I don't think it is our place to worry about the capacity of the unit - APH and Springer know about those things and if it can't be done, it won't. If APH doesn't think a feature will be worth enough in potential sales to justify implementing it, then that's their decision.
I'd prefer to see more questions and less about reactions to reactions to feature suggestions. Can we refrain from telling one another the function of the BookPort, how some of us live in the stone age, and how still others want the BP to do everything. We have a wonderful product, a fantastic support team, and a list which has been a real source of good feedback and an instrument for learning. Let's not let it become a vehicle for argument please.
