Of course using batteries is fine. Nobody's saying it's not. I'm only
proposing choice, options.
Bruce
-- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Kotler/McCarthy Marv/Josie wrote:
I think that using batteries is just fine. I am happy with this since I have not had any trouble. This is my opinion, of course. Marvin Kotler ----- Original Message ----- From: "Walt Smith" <ka3agm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 7:01 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
Aman Singer once posted information on a battery replacement that allowstheadditionalBP to operate on AC or, if memory serves, a cigarette lighter converter. I see this as potentially increasing the size of the device, sincehardware would be needed. On the other hand, it's something that I'd liketosee, too, provided its effects on size and weight weren't very great.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Toews" <dogriver@xxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
I would also like to see this. I know progress is frowned on here, but I think that letting me plug the unit in where the facilities exist would be gret - you'd then also be able to use a cigarette lighter adaptor.
bruce
-- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Chris Hill wrote:
Any reason for this? Looks to me like another thing to fail in the jack and it uses so little power anyway I don't get the point.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:05:21 -0700, you wrote:
I would like to see both ac and battery operation available.
Dory doryfish@xxxxxxxxxxx