I don't think the resources issue is very important anymore. I use a dec express but that's because I like the sound of it over the access 32 which comes with windoweyes. Five years ago this was a real issue, as somebody always looking for more speed, I don't even buy it anymore. On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:55:41 -0500, you wrote: >Hardware synthesizers will never outlive their usefulness for one >unescapable reason; software speech always takes resources away from the >computer, whereas hardware synths can do their own speech processing >internally. > >-----Original Message----- >From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >On Behalf Of Chris Hill >Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:49 AM >To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal > >I like the calculator idea. I think the synthesizer idea has outlived >its usefulness with all the speech programs I know of installing their >own software speech these days. > > >On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:22:13 -0500, you wrote: > >>Think of how much more useful the unit could be. I know doubletalk would >>probably charge money for the synth option, but it could all be done in >>firmware, maybe there could be a special firmware users would have to pay >>for if they wanted the synth. >>The calculator I think should be more considered, it would hardly take any >>extra space nor time to develop at least a simple one; and we all could use >>a calculator now and then. >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>On Behalf Of David Allen >>Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:57 AM >>To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal >> >>Hi Kevin and list: >> >>Yes, both have been thought of. Neither is justified in the context of a >>portable device whose reason for being is to read books. If you still need >a >> >>USB synthesiser, it is available as the Tripple talk. >> >>Cheers, >>Dave >> >> > >