[bookport] Re: new unit proposal

  • From: Bruce Toews <dogriver@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:07:43 -0500 (CDT)

I agree. I think we're too quick to want to stick with VersaBraille technology in a PakMate era (all brand names and trademarks are those of their respective owners and are used here for illustration purposes only; any similarity to devices, living or dead, while not coincidental, should not be viewed as endorsement or criticism of basic designs, principles, or innovations, in their approrpiate contexts).

Bruce

--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Rick and Pauline wrote:

Hi Jerry,

What do you have against progress and innovation?  With this sort of thinking 
we would have never replaced the horse and buggy.  It seems to me that you are 
too easily satisfied and are not thinking outside the box.

Rick


----- Original Message ----- From: Jerry Weinger To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:29 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal


Tom and List, My hope is that the Book Port evolves based upon its ability to read books, its small size, and its reasonable cost.



 Here is why I bought the Book Port

 1. I can read a book, in all of the formats, with a device that fits into my 
pocket. And I can have 100 more books on hand, in my other pocket. Doing this 
with a CD player would require a larger CD player, and a stack of CDs.



 2. The Book Port uses inexpensive off the shelf batteries, which I can replace 
myself.



 3. I had no further expectations for the Book Port; any more than I would 
expect a hammer to do the job of a drill.



 Sincerely,

 Jerry Weinger




------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of tom hawkins Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:29 PM To: Book Port Subject: [bookport] new unit proposal


Any consideration of a new unit should include a wide, thick rubber edge to protect the unit from accidental falls from tables and pockets etc.

Other related posts: