Guido, I have never actually timed it, but I can tell that my Epson 1660 is faster in warming up and scanning documents. Sharon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guido Corona" <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:50 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanner > Sharon, have you ever timed the 2400 scanner on a full page at 300 DPI? I > know the 1660 can do a complete pass with Kurzweil in approx 9 seconds, > but I understand 2400 may be a little slower. > > Guido > > > Guido D. Corona > IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. > IBM Research, > Phone: (512) 838-9735 > Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at: > http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html > > > > > > "Sharon Jackson" <dolly1025@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > 05/27/2004 06:55 AM > Please respond to > bksvol-discuss > > > To > <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > cc > > Subject > [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanner > > > > > > > I, too, use Epson. My home scanner is a 2400 model while my work scanner > is > a 1660. Both are great and I do not think I would return to an HP > Scanner. > > Sharon > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <rhod3021@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:28 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanner > > > > I like my Epson, smile, and the only scanner the State Agency in PA at > least > > the Erie office is buying right now. > > > > The Epson 1660 can have a opage done a lot quicker than 25 seconds. > > > > > > Shelley L. Rhodes and Judson, guiding golden > > juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > "We give dogs time we can spare, space we can spare and love we can > > spare. > > And in return, dogs give us their all. It's the best deal man has ever > > made" - M. Facklam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >