I have to add a few cents. I am too deaf to use talking books and depend on braille. I still have residual sight, so I can use Kurzweil to scan and then read in very large fonts with contrasting colors on the computer--but I can't take it to bed or with me for my 3 hours a day on the bus, etc. That's where braille and a notetaker come in. And after straining my eyes watching sign language if I've not receiving tactilely, or straining my eyes for visual computer, then braille is a delightful relaxation for reading. I have noted one thing that bothers me A LOT: kids who grew up using screenreaders and talking books often have really poor spelling skills. I have run across young adults getting trying to get their visually impaired teaching credentials, working on master's degrees, with the spelling skills of a junior high student. I believe braille should be taught as a tool for literacy--and as a general tool. There's a 7 year old I know who can't read standard large print books, and uses a CCTV for everything. Her V.I. teacher says she doesn't need braille so they don't plan to teach it--will use CCTV and screen readers. But what will she do on long drives in the car with her family? And to read in bed at night? Or if she's tuck in the bathroom for a long time? (Smile.) I believe braille should be taught and used as a tool so the individual can then decide *how* to use the tool to her or his advantage. Ok, soapbox done. I am so grateful for Bookshare making everything available in braille format. (NLS braille selections generally bored me as they were so limited of quantity and range.) Liz in Seattle Liz Halperin Seattle, WA lizzers@xxxxxxxxxxx